source: docs/PACT2011/06-scalability.tex @ 996

Last change on this file since 996 was 979, checked in by lindanl, 9 years ago

some changes to 06

File size: 2.6 KB
Line 
1\section{Scalability}
2\subsection{Performance}
3Figure \ref{TOT_Parabix2} shows the performance of Parabix2 on three different cores: core2, corei3 and sandybridge.
4The processing time, which is evaluated as CPU cycles per thousand bytes,
5is divided up by bitstream parsing and byte space postprocessing.
6Bitstream parsing, mainly consists of SIMD instructions,
7is able to achieve 17\% performance improvement moving from core2 to corei3;
822\% performance improvement moving from corei3 to sandybridge,
9which is relatively stable compared to postprocessing,
10which gains 18\% to 31\% performance moving from core2 to corei3;
110 to 17\% performance improvement moving from corei3 to sandybridge.
12
13As comparison, we also measured the performance of Expat on all the three cores.
14The results are shown in Figure \ref{TOT_Expat}.
15The performance improvement is less than 5\% by running Expat on corei3 instead of core2
16and it is less than 10\% by running on sandybridge instead of corei3.
17
18Parabix2 scales much better than Expat and is able to achieve an overall performance improvement
19up to 26\% simply by running the same code on a newer core.
20Further improvement on sandybridge with AVX will be discussed in the next section.
21
22\begin{figure}
23\begin{center}
24\includegraphics[width=85mm, trim= 0 200 0 200]{plots/TOT_Parabix2.pdf}
25\end{center}
26\caption{Total CPU cycles /KB of Parabix2}
27\label{TOT_Parabix2}
28\end{figure}
29
30\begin{figure}
31\begin{center}
32\includegraphics[width=85mm]{plots/TOT_Expat.pdf}
33\end{center}
34\caption{Total CPU cycles /KB of Expat}
35\label{TOT_Expat}
36\end{figure}
37
38
39\subsection{Power and Energy}
40
41The newer processors are not only designed to have better performance but also more energy-efficient.
42Figure \ref{power_Parabix2} shows the average power when running Parabix2 on core2, corei3 and sandybridge with different input files.
43On core2, the average power is about 32 watts. Corei3 saves 30\% of the power compared with core2.
44Sandybridge saves 25\% of the power compared with corei3 and consumes only 15 watts.
45
46The energy consumption is further improved by better performance, which means a shorter processing time, as we moved to the newer cores.
47As a result, Parabix2 on sandybridge cost 72\% to 75\% less energy than Parabix2 on core2.
48
49\begin{figure}
50\begin{center}
51\includegraphics[width=85mm]{plots/power_Parabix2.pdf}
52\end{center}
53\caption{Average Power of Parabix2 (watts)}
54\label{power_Parabix2}
55\end{figure}
56
57\begin{figure}
58\begin{center}
59\includegraphics[width=85mm]{plots/energy_Parabix2.pdf}
60\end{center}
61\caption{Energy consumption of Parabix2 (nJ/B)}
62\label{energy_Parabix2}
63\end{figure}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.