Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 16, 2011, 5:50:31 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
lindanl
Message:

more outline on paper

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • docs/PACT2011/03-research.tex

    r927 r949  
    1 \section{Parabix2}
     1\section{Parabix1}
    22\label{section:reserach}
     3Describe key technology behind Parabix
     4Introduce SIMD;
     5Talk about SSE
     6Highlight which SSE instructions are important
     7TAlk about each pass in the parser; How SSE is used in every phase...
     8Benefits of SSE in each phase.
    39
     10The results of \cite{CameronHerdyLin2008} showed that Parabix, the predecessor of Parabix2, was dramatically faster than both Expat 2.0.1 and Xerces-C++ 2.8.0.
     11It is our expectation is that Parabix2 will outperform both Expat 2.0.1 and Xerces-C++ 3.1.1 in terms of energy consumption per source XML byte.
     12This expectation is based on the relatively-branchless code composition of Parabix2 and the more-efficient utilization of last-level cache resources.
     13The authors of \cite {bellosa2001, bircher2007, bertran2010} indicate that such factors have a considerable effect on overall energy consumption.
     14Hence, one of the foci in our study is the manner in which straight line SIMD code influences energy usage.
     15
     16
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.